{"id":29898,"date":"2019-06-11T08:09:00","date_gmt":"2019-06-11T12:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/?p=29898"},"modified":"2019-06-11T08:09:00","modified_gmt":"2019-06-11T12:09:00","slug":"book-poly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/?p=29898","title":{"rendered":"Are You Book &#8216;Poly&#8217;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div id=\"attachment_29899\" style=\"width: 397px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-29899\" class=\"wp-image-29899\" src=\"http:\/\/wordpress.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/IMG_3863-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"387\" height=\"390\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-29899\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A few of my childhood go-to&#8217;s. I&#8217;d usually have three or four books going at once.<\/p><\/div><br \/>\nOne of our regulars, Lincoln, came to the store the other day with his dog, Zeno. This isn&#8217;t unusual; Lincoln and\u00a0Zeno\u00a0often end up at the bookstore after their jaunts through the woods and lakeside trails in our town. What was unusual was that Lincoln wasn&#8217;t looking for a book. &#8220;I&#8217;m reading five at the moment,&#8221; he said, &#8220;and while I&#8217;m tempted, I can&#8217;t add another to the mix.&#8221;<br \/>\nThis led to a lively storewide discussion of reading habits: who reads one book at a time, and who\u00a0likes to have several books going at once. (The store was split about 50\/50, though that may be\u00a0an atypical sampling.)<br \/>\n<!--more-->Each camp was firm in\u00a0its preferences; the one-at-a-timers couldn&#8217;t fathom wanting to juggle several storylines simultaneously, while the several-at-once-ers enjoyed\u00a0the opportunity to engage with\u00a0the different sides of their reading selves as the mood struck.<br \/>\nThe strength of the readers&#8217; feelings reminded me of conversations about monogamy versus polyamory (having more than one romantic connection at a time*). (*This is obviously a simplistic reduction of polyamory. I&#8217;m using it as a metaphor.)\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">As with mono\/poly preferences, readers seem innately and strongly drawn toward one style of book love over the other.\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">I was a several-at-once-er as a kid\u00a0and read as the mood struck me.\u00a0On any\u00a0given day, I might start with a deep dive into a\u00a0fantasy world, and then\u2014after an\u00a0interruption of some kind\u2014switch to silly poetry, or a mystery, or something spooky. &#8220;I contain multitudes!&#8221; my young reading soul would shout, and I rarely had\u00a0fewer than three books going at a time. <\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">These days, I&#8217;m still relatively book poly. Right now, I&#8217;m listening to Elizabeth Acevedo&#8217;s warm and memorable realistic YA novel,\u00a0<em>With the Fire on High<\/em> (beautifully read by the author) and reading Sarah Blake&#8217;s <em>The Guest Book <\/em>and Rebecca Solnit&#8217;s<em> Whose Story Is This?<\/em>\u00a0I&#8217;m also reading Ijeoma Oluo&#8217;s <em>So You Want to Talk About Race<\/em> for a discussion group\u00a0in town.\u00a0These books\u00a0are all so different from one another that they meet different needs and moods, and fit into different contexts of my days.\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">But sometimes I&#8217;ll start three or four books, looking to be swept up by just the right literary suitor, and when\u00a0the right one comes along, I&#8217;ll abandon the others and just focus on the sparkly new love. On those occasions, I suppose\u00a0I&#8217;m neither book mono nor book poly; I&#8217;m just a heartless spinebreaker.\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\nWhen it comes to your reading habits, are you book mono, book poly, or something else altogether?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some readers love more than one book at a time, while others are serial monogamists.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29898","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29898","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29898"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29898\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.publishersweekly.com\/blogs\/shelftalker\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}