It’s Not So Easy Giving Away Books: World Book Night US

Judith Rosen -- April 24th, 2012

In principle what could be simpler than handing out a free book, no strings attached. Just read, enjoy, and pass to a friend. In reality, not so much. It took me 50 minutes to hand out 20 copies of Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried to commuters in Central Square Cambridge, Mass., as they wended their way home from work. Maybe I should have taken the morning’s pouring rain as an omen, or the person who told me on my morning walk, “You’ll have trouble giving out 20 books. I’ll take what you can’t hand out and give them to my charity.”

I started to worry as I reread the opening of the book on the bus to Central Square. I had forgotten that in the first few pages there’s sex, drugs, and death. O’Brien doesn’t hold anything back from the get go. What if people are offended before they even get started on one of the best books about the Vietnam War, about writing, about life?

I should have made a sign. But I didn’t realize that until I put down my books and realized that people just thought I was loitering. So I held up three books and used them as a sign and called out, “Free books. World Book Night.” Not a single person had heard of World Book Night, including those who stopped to talk with me. Then, as a young woman explained to me, they look like religious books. That’s why everyone’s averting their eyes, she said.

Two well-dressed 20-somethings in business attire ran up to me, as much as you can run in high heels, excited because they thought I was doing an advance promotion for a reading by O’Brien. When they found out I was giving out the book, they walked away. They’d already read it, they said. So had a few other people; it’s a good book, they said. The FedEx driver didn’t like it. She probably had to read it for school and write an essay about the things she carried. Anyway, UPS co-sponsored World Book Night, no worries.

My first taker was a security guard from CVS, who said he would read it that evening. Number two was a gray-haired lady who thought World Book Night, after I explained it to her, sounded great, kind of like the walk to raise money for a chorale society that she had just heard about. I never did get that connection, but she was very happy to have a brand new book. So was another woman, but I almost had to ask her to give it back once I found out she’s a reader. She reads a book a week, and had read almost every book being given out across the country last night. Although she prefers physical books, it’s hard to move them when she changes apartments. Her husband likes her to buy books on the Kindle.

Make eye contact, I reminded myself. Someone wants a copy of this book. One man tapped his breast pocket; I have a Kindle. Two people in scrubs walked by smoking intently as if that would protect them from me and my free books. A short woman in a brown wig stopped in front of me. Rose. I hadn’t seen her since my father-in-law died just over a year ago. She had been his caretaker. We talked briefly. I forgot I was still holding the books. She asked if she could have one. Yes.

Some people walking in pairs took only one book. One man from Russia wasn’t interested in Vietnam. Do you have something on World War II? One woman was flustered that she couldn’t make a donation. The last book went to a youngish man. Will it tell me more about World Book Night if I read this? Yes, I said. It will tell you how to get more information. But it’s simple really. It’s about getting people reading. I hope he likes it and passes it on to a friend. That’s really what World Book Night is about. And it doesn’t hurt if it encompasses sex, drugs, rock-n-roll, and a generation, too, all in one short book.

100 Books Called ‘The Man Who…’

Gabe Habash -- April 23rd, 2012

If you’re writing a book and want to title it some iteration of The Man Who…, that makes you the man or woman who titles your book like everyone else. That’s because typing in “the man who” into a Goodreads search yields 2,567 results–and that’s not including titles that being with “the man in” (The Man in the High Castle, The Man in the Iron Mask). The only title template more common is “_____ & _____” (War & Peace, Sense and Sensibility). But PWxyz will admit a soft spot for a book named The Man Who Loved Clowns.

The Man Who Was Thursday

The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat

The Man Who Had Everything

The Man Who Ate Everything

The Man Who Ate the 747

The Man Who Couldn’t Eat

The Man Who Ate His Boots

The Man Who Ate the World

The Man Who Cycled the World

The Man Who Sold the World Read the rest of this entry »

The Unbelievably Bad-Looking ‘Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter’ Movie

Gabe Habash -- April 20th, 2012

In case you don't like Lincoln axe-brooding in a parlor, you can have Lincoln axe-brooding in the woods.

We’re going to show you this trailer for Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter because it looks really, really bad. Fascinatingly bad. Director Timur Bekmambetov is capable of making pretty decent movies (Night Watch series) and abominable movies (Wanted), and, unless the trailer here is completely misrepresenting the film’s tone, it looks like this one will be comfortably situated at the latter end of the spectrum. Bekmambetov, the actors, writers, wranglers and caterers of the movie all seem to think it’s a good idea to make a straight-faced film about Abraham Lincoln killing vampires even though it’s a movie about Abraham Lincoln killing vampires. For the love of Pete, it looks more serious than Van Helsing! The lack of any sort of self-awareness or tongue-in-cheekness, the fact Johnny Cash’s voice and Inception orchestral blares are in this and there’s not one wink–the fact that Abraham Lincoln chops a tree in slow motion with so much force it flies up–is enough to make you uncomfortable. It’s the same feeling you get when you see someone making a very bad mistake they don’t know they’re making. They played the trailer for this before a showing of Cabin in the Woods this past weekend, and the audience was dead silent for its duration. But when the title came up, there was a mixture of groaning and laughter, but mostly, there was the verbal equivalent of cringing. I don’t think anyone’s shocked that the movie’s being made–it’s sold close to 300,000 copies in print according to the outlets that report to Neilsen BookScan–but that it looks as humorless as J. Edgar is…alarming. Watch the thing below.

Can You Guess These Classic Books From Their Phantom Covers?

Gabe Habash -- April 19th, 2012

PWxyz thinks you should play this game where we vacuumed up the words from the covers of famous books and you have to guess the book just by the art. Special bonus points if you can get #10. Actually, if you get all 10, we’ll write a song for you and it’ll be super heartfelt. We like to use falsetto.

Answers at the bottom!

1.

2.

3.

Read the rest of this entry »

A List of Good Books the Pulitzer Didn’t Pick

Gabe Habash -- April 17th, 2012

Some reactions following the announcement that the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction was a head fake:

“Shocked…angry…and very disappointed.”

-Pulitzer fiction juror Susan Larson

“Honestly, I feel angry on behalf of three great American novels.”

-Pulitzer fiction juror Maureen Corrigan

“I was so thrilled for Karen,” Ms. Pavlin said. “Then my second response was, what a shame, because the committee had it within their power to do something so wonderful for any one of those novelists. And they, for whatever reason, chose not to.”

-Swamplandia! editor Jordan Pavlin

According to the Pulitzer’s site, the award is “for distinguished fiction by an American author, preferably dealing with American life.” But no book, apparently, was distinguished enough.

There are a lot of people who lose out with this decision, the largest group of which is the reading public, who, as the Washington Post‘s Ron Charles tweeted, “would have been directed to a good novel.” Larson said the fiction reading community hopefully will now be encouraged to “read three books instead of one,” and we couldn’t agree more. That’s why we’ve put together some good books from last year that the Pulitzer didn’t think were worthy.

Train Dreams by Denis Johnson

The Pale King by David Foster Wallace

Swamplandia! by Karen Russell

The Call by Yannick Murphy

State of Wonder by Ann Patchett

The Marriage Plot by Jeffrey Eugenides

The Devil All the Time by Donald Ray Pollock

Changó’s Beads and Two-Tone Shoes by William Kennedy

We the Animals by Justin Torres

Open City by Teju Cole

Someday This Will Be Funny by Lynne Tillman

I Married You for Happiness by Lily Tuck

The Art of Fielding by Chad Harbach

The Buddha in the Attic by Julie Otsuka

Ghost Lights by Lydia Millet

A Moment in the Sun by John Sayles

My New American Life by Francine Prose

Stone Arabia by Dana Spiotta

The Submission by Amy Waldman

Ten Thousand Saints by Eleanor Henderson

Rules of Civility by Amor Towles

The Evolution of Bruno Littlemore by Benjamin Hale

Salvage the Bones by Jesmyn Ward

Once Upon a River by Bonnie Jo Campbell

Binocular Vision by Edith Pearlman

The Angel Esmeralda by Don DeLillo

The Family Fang by Kevin Wilson

Serving a public that knows how to copy: orphan works and mass digitization

Peter Brantley -- April 14th, 2012

Marxchivist, Indigent Orphans

Flickr, CC-BY, @Marxchivist


The UC Berkeley Center for Law and Technology (BCLT) is among the most eminent study centers for intellectual property (IP) law. Coordinated by Professor Pamela Samuelson, this last week it pulled together approximately 200 highly accomplished and well-spoken legal scholars, practitioners and librarians in a small conference on orphan works, “Orphan Works and Mass Digitization.”

Obstacles and opportunities.

The conference started with a series of talks on the dysfunctions of current copyright law, with its propensity to generate orphans. The overall consensus, most succinctly aired by Brewster Kahle of the Internet Archive, is that the the problem is so pervasive and the barriers to a comprehensive resolution so high — while networked communications make sharing ever more straightforward — that institutions are increasingly prone to adopt a “Damn the torpedoes” approach. For these panelists, the prospect of new legislation attempting to facilitate use of material with dim rights status is often scarier than the status quo given political deadlock; further, uncertainty over the use of these materials is endemic but the risk is fairly low, in part because libraries, archives, and museums (LAMs) are respectful and conservative. At the same time, the cultural value is often tremendous.
Read the rest of this entry »

Poll: Who’s Your Favorite Infinite Jest Character?

Gabe Habash -- April 13th, 2012

For the past two weeks, PWxyz has been devoted to Infinite Jest, giving specific reasons for our love for its characters, and counting down our top 10 favorites. But now it’s your chance to let us know the characters that made the book most memorable for you. Below, we’ve listed basically all characters of consequence in the book. And because it’s unfair to ask you to pick just one, we’ve opened the voting up to five selections per voter. And be sure to let us know why in the comments below. May the best character win.

The Top 10 ‘Infinite Jest’ Characters

Gabe Habash -- April 13th, 2012

One of the many joys of Infinite Jest, made possible because of its tremendous length, is its massive cast of characters. The deeper you go, the more characters you encounter and, as you go even deeper, the intersecting lines between the characters become apparent. Just take a look at this diagram. To celebrate the book’s huge ensemble, we’ve counted down the 10 best characters. For the list, we’re excluding the book’s two “main” characters, Hal and Gately, because they’re given time and consideration that the rest of the characters don’t get, and thus can’t be evaluated in the same way. Be sure to tell us whether you agree of disagree with our selections in the comments!

10.  Barry Loach

Loach’s own soul began to sprout little fungal patches of necrotic rot, and his upbeat view of the so-called normal and respectable human race began to undergo dark revision.

E.T.A. trainer Barry Loach is mentioned only two or three times in the first 900 pages of Infinite Jest. But then, on page 966, in a scene with Hal and the other players readying for Fundraising tennis matches, the narrative zooms in on Loach, who is shaving Hal’s ankle and readying it for athletic tape (“everybody’s had his hands on Loach’s shoulders at one time or another”). From there, in two fat paragraphs that span five pages, we get the long and short of Loach’s life.

Resembling “a blunt and scuttly wingless fly,” Loach comes from an enormous Catholic family. His mother, more than anything, wants one of her children to enter the Roman Catholic clergy. For the following reasons, Loach child after Loach child does not fulfill her wishes:

First-born Loach: Killed in the Brazilian O.N.A.N./U.N. joint action

Second-born Loach: Poisoned by ciguatoxins from a tainted blackfin grouper

Third-born Loach (Therese): Becomes a ring girl in a sequined leotard for professional fights in Atlantic City

Another Loach: Falls helplessly in love and marries right out of high school

Still Another Loach: Burned to play the cymbals; fulfilled wish

And all the way down the line until it’s just Barry (the youngest) and the second-youngest brother. Luckily for Barry, his older brother:

“Was always a pious and contemplative and big-hearted kid, brimming over with abstract love and an innate faith in the indwelling goodness of all men’s souls, [and he] began to show evidence of a true spiritual calling to a life of service in the R.C. clergy.”

But then, not-so-luckily:

“He suffered at age twenty-five a sudden and dire spiritual decline in which his basic faith in the innate indwelling goodness of men like spontaneously combusted and disappeared–and for no apparent or dramatic reason; it just seemed as if the brother had suddenly contracted a black misanthropic spiritual outlook the way some twenty-five-year-old men contract Sanger-Brown’s ataxia or M.S., a kind of degenerative Lou Gehrig’s Disease of the spirit–and his interest in serving man and God-in-man and nurturing the indwelling Christ in people through Jesuitical pursuits underwent an understandable nosedive.”

This is a problem for Barry, the very last Loach, whose “true vocation of splints and flexion” would become nullified should his older brother change his mind and stop his religious pursuit. So, Barry heads down to the seminary to do some convincing. And the two brothers, after “heated and high-level debates on spirituality and the soul’s potential, not unlike Alyosha and Ivan’s conversations in the good old Brothers K.,” settle on this experiment: Barry is to make himself look squalid and stand outside the Park Street T-station and hold out his hand and instead of asking for change from passerbys, he is to ask them just to touch him. If one person touches him, just one, Barry’s brother will re-enter the seminary.

It turns out that “holding out his hand and asking people to touch him ensured that just about the last thing any passerby in his right mind would want to do was touch him.” However, saying “Touch me, just touch me, please,” while not an effective way to get a stranger to touch you, is an effective way to panhandle, and Barry begins to make a good deal of money, “significantly more than he was earning at his work-study job wrapping ankles and sterilizing dental prostheses for Boston College lacrosse players.”

But no touching. Months pass. Barry’s brother stops coming to watch, Barry himself gets fired from his work-study, and basically turns into a bum himself in his quest to get someone to touch him. Despair reigns. He “falls in with the absolute silt at the very bottom of the metro Boston socioeconomic duck-pond.”

But then, in the ninth month, just when Barry is “dangerously close to disappearing forever into the fringes and dregs of metro Boston street life,” something happens, courtesy of Mario Incandenza:

Mario, being alone and only fourteen and largely clueless about anti-stem defensive strategies outside T-stations, had had no one worldly or adult along with him there to explain to him why the request of men with outstretched hands for a simple handshake or High Five shouldn’t automatically be honored and granted, and Mario had extended his clawlike hand and touched and heartily shaken Loach’s own fuliginous hand, which led through convoluted but kind of heartwarming and faith-reaffirming series of circumstances to B. Loach, even w/o an official B.A., being given an Asst. Trainer’s job at E.T.A.

Loach’s memorability is a product of his story’s placement. The fact that Wallace puts his story, which is one of the book’s main arguments for the good of human nature, at the very tail of the narrative is quite significant. In fact, the image of Mario and Loach shaking hands is the third-to-last passage of the book (the only following scenes are Orin revealing the Master’s location and Gately’s climactic vision of Facklemann’s death). Infinite Jest is both comedy and tragedy, and it makes cases for both the good of human nature (Mario, Bruce Green, Joelle Van Dyne) and the evil of human nature (Lenz, the A.F.R. [the broomstick moment], The M.P.), and maybe the book isn’t about one winning out over the other. But in Loach’s particular case, it actually does boil down to good vs. evil, and the simple (yet miraculous) appearance of Mario, resolving the question in the favor of good, makes for one of the book’s most touching moments.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Top 10 Infinite Jest Characters: #1 Mario Incandenza

Gabe Habash -- April 13th, 2012

One of the many joys of Infinite Jest, made possible because of its tremendous length, is its massive cast of characters. The deeper you go, the more characters you encounter and, as you go even deeper, the intersecting lines between the characters become apparent. Just take a look at this diagram. To celebrate the book’s huge ensemble, we’re counting down the 10 best characters over the next two weeks, culminating with the #1 character on Friday, April 13. On that day, we’ll post one giant composite article with all 10 characters. For the list, we’re excluding the book’s two “main” characters, Hal and Gately, because they’re given time and consideration that the rest of the characters don’t get, and thus can’t be evaluated in the same way. So join us as we reveal our favorites and be sure to tell us whether you agree of disagree with our selections in the comments!

#10 Barry Loach, #9 Hugh Steeply, #8 Mrs. Waite, #7 Bruce Green, #6 Ortho Stice, #5 Avril Incandenza, #4 Joelle van Dyne, #3 Michael Pemulis, #2 Eric Clipperton

Today, we’ll look at bradykinetic, middle Incandenza son.

1. Mario Incandenza

And as pinkie meets palm, she says what she’s said for three years of midnights, an opening bit that Mario Incandenza, the least cynical person in the history of Enfield MA, across the river, listening faithfully, finds, for all its black cynicism, terribly compelling.

You could probably see this coming from a mile away.

Mario, himself, is not only a great character, but he makes countless other characters more memorable (see Loach, Avril, Clipperton). He is the emotional node of the Incandenzas, he runs the clockwork of Infinite Jest. If you want something objective (to this reader): he has more sentences that take your breath away than any other character. The book’s best passage (to this reader) is the six page description of Mario’s birth and the way he affects those around him (312-317). In my copy, in which I underline things I like, it looks like this:

I loved this section so much I retyped it just to experience it in a different way. I didn’t even send it to anyone; it’s just sitting on my computer. Allow me a few excerpts:

 He had to be more or less scraped out, Mario, like the meat of an oyster from a womb to whose sides he’d been found spiderishly clinging, tiny and unobtrusive, attached by cords of sinew at both feet and a hand, the other fist stuck to his face by the same material. He was a complete surprise and terribly premature, and withered, and he spent the next many weeks waggling his withered and contractured arms up at the Pyrex ceilings of incubators, being fed by tubes and monitored by wires and cupped in sterile palms, his head cradled by a thumb.

There was almost nobody at E.T.A. or its Enfield-Brighton environs who did not treat Mario M. Incandenza with the casual gentility of somebody who doesn’t pity you or admire you so much as just vaguely prefer it if you were around.

…[he] took citizens’ kindness and cruelty the same way, with a kind of extra-inclined half-bow that mocked his own canted posture without pity or cringe.

Players at Denny’s, when they all get to go to Denny’s, almost vie to see who gets to cut up the cutupable parts of Mario’s under-12-size Kilobreakfast.

And then there’s this, maybe my favorite passage in the book, if not the most gut-punchingly affecting:

And his younger and way more externally impressive brother Hal almost idealizes Mario, secretly. God-type issues aside, Mario is a (semi-) walking miracle, Hal believes. People who’re somehow burned at birth, withered or ablated way past anything like what might be fair, they either curl up in their fire, or else they rise. Withered saurian homodontic Mario floats, for Hal. He calls him Booboo but fears his opinion more than probably anybody except their Moms’s. Hal remembers the unending hours of blocks and balls on the hardwood floors of early childhood’s 36 Belle Ave., Weston MA, tangrams and See ‘N Spell, huge-headed Mario hanging in there for games he could not play, for make-believe in which he had no interest other than proximity to his brother.

Then there’s the section entitled MARIO INCANDENZA’S FIRST AND ONLY EVEN REMOTELY ROMANTIC EXPERIENCE, THUS FAR, in which Millicent Kent (nicknamed the U.S.S. Millicent Kent because of her size) corners Mario in the woods and we get writing like this:

The U.S.S. Millicent Kent told Mario that off the record she’d always felt he had the longest lushest prettiest lashes of any boy on two continents, three if you counted Australia. Mario thanked her kindly, calling her Ma’am and trying to fake a Southern accent.

Mario kept saying Golly Ned, all he could think of to say.

At which point U.S.S. Millicent stopped them in an unprickly thicket of what later turned out to be poison sumac and turned with a strange glint in the one eye that wasn’t in pine-shadow and crushed Mario’s large head to the area just below her breasts and said she needed to confess that Mario’s eyelashes and vest with extendable police lock he used for staying upright in one place had for quite some time now driven her right around the bend with sensual feeling. What Mario perceived as a sudden radical drop in the prevailing temperature was in fact the U.S.S. Millicent Kent’s sexual stimulation sucking tremendous quantities of ambient energy out of the air surrounding them.

And there’s the section early on between E.T.A. coach Gerhardt Schtitt and Mario, and why Schtitt prefers Mario’s company:

Mario is basically a born listener. One of the positives to being visibly damaged is that people can sometimes forget you’re there, even when they’re interfacing with you. You almost get to eavesdrop. It’s almost like they’re like: If nobody’s really in there, there’s nothing to be shy about. That’s why bullshit often tends to drop away around damaged listeners, deep beliefs revealed, diary-type private reveries indulged out loud; and, listening, the beaming and bradykinetic boy gets to forge an interpersonal connection he knows only he can truly feel, here.

The point of reiterating all of these scenes here is to show how many pages in Infinite Jest are made memorable by Mario’s presence, and the effect his presence brings out in other characters. Mario becomes like Wallace’s narrative skeleton key, allowing us access to a score of the book’s cast, adding layers of understanding to our reading that wouldn’t exist without him.

One more example–here’s why there’s a relationship between Pemulis and Mario:

 The two have the kind of transpersonal bond that shared interests and mutual advantage can inspire: if Mario’s not helping Pemulis fabricate the products of independent-optical-study work M.P. isn’t really much into doing, then Pemulis is giving Mario, who’s a film-nut but no great tech-mind, serious help with cinemo-optical praxis.

That’s why Mario is a great character, narratively speaking. Speaking in the ways that stories really matter–namely, their ability to move us–Mario is a great character because the relationship he has with all of these characters shows the best sides of their nature. Go down the line with the characters that Mario, in one way or another, touches: Hal, Avril, Loach, Himself, Clipperton, Millicent Kent, Pemulis, Schtitt. Every single one of them becomes more human–becomes better–for having Mario in their lives, even despite the evil and sadness that is also in the book’s world. In that way, Mario is a sort elixir of goodness. He is purely good, and this rubs off on those who are near him.

Mario is Infinite Jest‘s finest example of the good of humanity in the face of difficulty and evil. He is an argument for good’s strength over addiction, tragedy, and loss. He’s the book’s most memorable character, and one of the very best characters I’ve encountered in anything I’ve read. In all the dense pages of Infinite Jest, the parts I’ll remember most fondly are the singular images centered around Mario:

Coach Schtitt and Mario tear-ass downhill on W. Commonwealth on Schtitt’s old BMW, bound for Evangeline’s Low-Temperature Confections in Newton Center, right at the bottom of what usually gets called Heartbreak Hill, Schtitt intense-faced and leaning forward like a skier, his white scarf whipping around and whipping Mario’s face, in the sidecar, as Mario too leans way forward into their downhill flight, preparing to whoop when they bottom out.

The Top 10 Infinite Jest Characters: #2 Eric Clipperton

Gabe Habash -- April 12th, 2012

One of the many joys of Infinite Jest, made possible because of its tremendous length, is its massive cast of characters. The deeper you go, the more characters you encounter and, as you go even deeper, the intersecting lines between the characters become apparent. Just take a look at this diagram. To celebrate the book’s huge ensemble, we’re counting down the 10 best characters over the next two weeks, culminating with the #1 character on Friday, April 13. On that day, we’ll post one giant composite article with all 10 characters. For the list, we’re excluding the book’s two “main” characters, Hal and Gately, because they’re given time and consideration that the rest of the characters don’t get, and thus can’t be evaluated in the same way. So join us as we reveal our favorites and be sure to tell us whether you agree of disagree with our selections in the comments!

#10 Barry Loach, #9 Hugh Steeply, #8 Mrs. Waite, #7 Bruce Green, #6 Ortho Stice, #5 Avril Incandenza, #4 Joelle van Dyne, #3 Michael Pemulis

Today, we’ll look at the leader of the Clipperton Brigade.

2. Eric Clipperton

Nobody’d heard of him before or knew where he came from. He’d just sort of seepily risen, some sort of human radon, from someplace low and unknown, whence he lent the cliche ‘Win or Die in the Attempt’ grotesquely literal new levels of sense.

It only takes the space of about seven pages for Eric Clipperton to make himself one of Infinite Jest‘s most memorable characters. His story is delivered as a legend: he is a sixteen-year-old boy who one day shows up to a tennis tournament. No one knows who he is and his only listed affiliation is “Ind.”, presumably for “Independent.” Midway through his first tournament match, already losing, Clipperton goes to his bag and pulls out a Glock 17. He then announces to the crowd that, should he lose, he’ll blow his brains out on the court. He wins the match, playing the rest of it with the gun to his head, his opponent Ross Reat “obliterated psychologically.”

What follows is a string of tournaments in which Clipperton appears, plays with the gun to his head, and his opponents (now known as “the Clipperton Brigade”) “barely even try, or else they go for impossible angles and spins, or else talk on mobile phones while they play or try to hit every ball between their legs or behind their backs” because the USTA finds out about Clipperton’s stunt and nullifies all losses to him, “and a boy who found himself in the Clipperton Brigade and defaulted his round tended to view that tournament as a kind of unexpected vacation, a chance to rest and heal, to finally get some sun on the chest and ankles, to work on chinks in his game’s armor, to reflect a little on what it all might mean.”

Clipperton never loses. He wins six major junior tournaments. And after he collects his trophies, he always “vanishes like the ground itself inhaled him.”

After the fluke of getting ranked #1 in the 18-and-under, Clipperton shows up at ETA one night and asks to speak with Incandenza. Shortly thereafter, Clipperton shoots himself in a room that becomes known as the Clipperton Suite, in front of Incandenza and Mario, his only friend.

And despite the sad end to Clipperton’s short appearance in the book, despite the oddness of his appearance in the first place, the truly memorable thing about Clipperton is his friendship to Mario–the sum total of which is contained within one brief glimpse of video footage captured at a tennis tournament. That moment is one of the book’s most beautiful and stirring:

Just a couple overexposed meters of Clipperton, head down and hunched on a low orange bleacher, bony-shouldered, in no shirt and untied Nikes, his Gothic-scripted case in his lap, his elbows on his knees and his hands spidered across both cheeks, staring down between his feet and trying not to smile as a withered-toddler-sized and forward-listing Mario stands beside him, supported by his portable police lock, holding a light-meter and something else too halated to make out on the tape, open very wide for a homodontic laugh at something funny Clipperton has apparently just let slip.