<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please take your hat off when you enter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/</link>
	<description>The news blog of Publishers Weekly. On Twitter @PWxyz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:07:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/comment-page-1/#comment-69562</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/?p=11616#comment-69562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank You Peter for your considered and respectful comments. Unlike Penguin US who seem to show no respect, or even consideration and certainly no entrepreneurial spirit. Every large publisher (NOT selling their ebooks to libraries) trots out the same unsubstantiated emotional rhetoric about why. I imagine the excellent small and mid sized exciting and forward thinking publishers who are selling their titles will be further delighted. It is definitely the case here in Australia&amp;NZ where our Wheelers ePlatform is signing up libraries with large budgets every week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You Peter for your considered and respectful comments. Unlike Penguin US who seem to show no respect, or even consideration and certainly no entrepreneurial spirit. Every large publisher (NOT selling their ebooks to libraries) trots out the same unsubstantiated emotional rhetoric about why. I imagine the excellent small and mid sized exciting and forward thinking publishers who are selling their titles will be further delighted. It is definitely the case here in Australia&amp;NZ where our Wheelers ePlatform is signing up libraries with large budgets every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/comment-page-1/#comment-69462</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/?p=11616#comment-69462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These publishers seem as clueless as the early automakers who, it is said, still put buggy whip holders on their cars.

Success with a new technology means understanding its advantages. For ebooks, those are:

* Additional copies after the first are virtually free.

* Copies never wear out.

Think about that a bit and you&#039;ll realize that means that the best business model is:

* Making ebooks as widely available as possible. Copies are free, so why not spread them around widely?

* Per use renting makes more sense than selling. Since that copy never wears out, you can rent it an unlimited number of times.

Penguin is getting is all wrong. Every willing library in the country should have every book in its list. That maximizes the market of potential renters. And no library should have to buy their titles. Instead a small fee should be accessed whenever an ebook is checked out or renewed.

The greater the distribution, the greater the number of rentals. The greater the number of rentals, the greater the income. Hoarding digital books, limiting access to them and treating them as if they had a shelf life, makes absolutely no sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These publishers seem as clueless as the early automakers who, it is said, still put buggy whip holders on their cars.</p>
<p>Success with a new technology means understanding its advantages. For ebooks, those are:</p>
<p>* Additional copies after the first are virtually free.</p>
<p>* Copies never wear out.</p>
<p>Think about that a bit and you&#8217;ll realize that means that the best business model is:</p>
<p>* Making ebooks as widely available as possible. Copies are free, so why not spread them around widely?</p>
<p>* Per use renting makes more sense than selling. Since that copy never wears out, you can rent it an unlimited number of times.</p>
<p>Penguin is getting is all wrong. Every willing library in the country should have every book in its list. That maximizes the market of potential renters. And no library should have to buy their titles. Instead a small fee should be accessed whenever an ebook is checked out or renewed.</p>
<p>The greater the distribution, the greater the number of rentals. The greater the number of rentals, the greater the income. Hoarding digital books, limiting access to them and treating them as if they had a shelf life, makes absolutely no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copygirl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/comment-page-1/#comment-69433</link>
		<dc:creator>copygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/?p=11616#comment-69433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Shouldn’t publishers be working with libraries to reach disadvantaged kids, and bring them into the only future for books that counts?&quot;

On behalf of independent booksellers everywhere, &quot;OUCH.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shouldn’t publishers be working with libraries to reach disadvantaged kids, and bring them into the only future for books that counts?&#8221;</p>
<p>On behalf of independent booksellers everywhere, &#8220;OUCH.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iliad1954</title>
		<link>http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/comment-page-1/#comment-69401</link>
		<dc:creator>Iliad1954</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 04:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/?p=11616#comment-69401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When most e-books can be had for less than $10, why should I bother with the library? The electronic queue is too long anyway . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When most e-books can be had for less than $10, why should I bother with the library? The electronic queue is too long anyway . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/06/21/please-take-your-hat-off-when-you-enter/comment-page-1/#comment-69393</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/?p=11616#comment-69393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;   In other words, communities 
&gt;   subsidize publishers’ “doorstopper” books, 
&gt;   while being forced to pay repeatedly for 
&gt;   titles that are already financially successful.

this was always the case for the big publishers...

purchases by libraries across the country meant
that virtually every book they published enjoyed
a _built-in_ base minimum, from its very start...

and now those publishers have turned their backs
on libraries.  they should be ashamed of themselves.
what they are doing is not simply a mere faux pas;
they have let their greed turn them into monsters.

libraries worldwide should stop buying _any_ books
from these bastards, neither e-books nor p-books...

-bowerbird]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;   In other words, communities<br />
&gt;   subsidize publishers’ “doorstopper” books,<br />
&gt;   while being forced to pay repeatedly for<br />
&gt;   titles that are already financially successful.</p>
<p>this was always the case for the big publishers&#8230;</p>
<p>purchases by libraries across the country meant<br />
that virtually every book they published enjoyed<br />
a _built-in_ base minimum, from its very start&#8230;</p>
<p>and now those publishers have turned their backs<br />
on libraries.  they should be ashamed of themselves.<br />
what they are doing is not simply a mere faux pas;<br />
they have let their greed turn them into monsters.</p>
<p>libraries worldwide should stop buying _any_ books<br />
from these bastards, neither e-books nor p-books&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.publishersweekly.com @ 2013-05-23 08:52:10 -->